Please note, this is an approximate translation provided by Google Translate

Concerns swirl about the NATO ‘bridge’ for Ukraine



Dozens of foreign policy experts are calling on NATO members to avoid advancing toward Ukrainian membership at the alliance’s upcoming summit, warning that it would endanger the U.S. and allies and rupture the coalition.


In a letter obtained by NatSec Daily, the group argues that if Ukraine is admitted, Russia attacking Ukraine in the future would trigger NATO’s Article 5, which calls on members to rush to a member’s defense if attacked. It’s a common assertion, but such a public stance from more than 60 analysts provides a sneak peek at the arguments likely to be levied at next week’s NATO Summit in Washington.

“The closer NATO comes to promising that Ukraine will join the alliance once the war ends, the greater the incentive for Russia to keep fighting the war,” the letter reads. “The challenges Russia poses can be managed without bringing Ukraine into NATO.”

Moving Ukraine toward membership could backfire, the letter continues, “turning Ukraine into the site of a prolonged showdown between the world’s two leading nuclear powers” and play into Russian leader VLADIMIR PUTIN’s narrative that it’s Moscow versus the West.

Debates over what the U.S. and allies should guarantee Ukraine are shaping up. Last week, RAND Corporation researchers wrote that allies would benefit from offering Ukraine clarity about conditions for its future membership at the summit. The Atlantic Council has also been pushing for NATO membership for Ukraine.

The Biden administration has refrained from supporting Kyiv’s immediate membership, but multiple top officials recently said a “bridge” into the alliancewould be offered to Ukraine during the summit. Officials say NATO will also offer Ukraine a new headquarters to manage its military assistance — a gesture of good faith that the West will have the country’s back for the long term, even if it’s not afforded membership right now.

Writing in Foreign Affairs today, outgoing NATO Secretary General JENS STOLTENBERG didn’t explicitly mention Ukraine membership, but alluded to Kyiv’s future alongside the alliance and concerns about the matter: “We want to make it clear that we are in this for the long haul … Stepping up our support does not make NATO a party to this conflict.”

From what we’re hearing, Ukraine isn’t expecting much movement on its membership at the summit. Security guarantees are what they’re looking for, and there are already hopeful signs for Kyiv: NATO members agreed to Stoltenberg’s request that they keep military funding for the country at $43 billion in 2025, the same level of funding since Russia’s invasion, Reuters reports. On Tuesday, the U.S. announced a new $2.3 billion security package for Ukraine.

Ukrainians say they need the West to provide additional weapons and ammunition more than they need accession into NATO, according to a European Council on Foreign Relations poll released today. Only 22 percent of Ukrainians are in favor of accepting NATO membership in exchange for giving up territory occupied by Russia, while 71 percent are against such a deal.

Ukraine is still pursuing its maximalist objectives against Russia to recapture all of the territory it has lost in the war, ANDRIY YERMAK, President VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY’s top adviser, told a small group of reporters Tuesday night. Ukraine was “not ready to compromise,” even as some U.S. and European allies quietly whispered to officials in Kyiv that talks with Russia should begin.

Kyiv is only willing to negotiate based on its 10-point peace formula which, Yermak said, would lead to a “just peace” for his country.